/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) language proficiency (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: language proficiency
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines110 - : Chapelle, C., W. Grabe y M. Berns (1993) Communicative language proficiency: Definitions and implications for TOEFL 2000 . Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. [ [114]Links ]
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines429 - : Two methods have been frequently used to measure language proficiency: self-reports (e .g. Bylund & Athanasopoulos, 2014) and formal tests (e.g. Bylund & Jarvis, 2011(Bylund & Jarvis, 2011)). Scholars have questioned self-report surveys as valid and reliable measures of language proficiency (e.g. Dörnyei, 2001) mainly due to the subjectivity inherent in self-reports, as participants may over or under report their ability. Another criticism against self-reports is participants’ insufficient experience in self-assessment. Considering the criticism leveled at self-report, in the present study, Oxford Quick Placement Test (QPT; Oxford University Press, 2001) was used to divide participants into the three groups.
Evaluando al candidato language proficiency:
1) participants: 3
2) bylund: 3
3) self-reports: 3
language proficiency
Lengua:
Frec: 50
Docs: 19
Nombre propio: / 50 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.648 = ( + (1+3.32192809488736) / (1+5.6724253419715)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| language proficiency |
: Alderson, C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency. London: Continuum. : Alderson, J. C., Clapham, C. & Steel, D. (1997). Metalinguistic knowledge, language aptitude and language proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 1(2), 93-121. : Alexandria, W. (2009). Adult English learners’ self assessment of second language proficiency: Contexts and conditions. New York: New York University Press. : Cheng, W. & Warren, M. (2005). Peer assessment of language proficiency. Language Testing, 22, 93-121. : Falce-Robinson, J. & Strother, D. (2012). Language proficiency and civic engagement: The incorporation of meaningful service-learning projects in Spanish language courses. Interdisciplinary Humanities, 29(3), 73-87. : Han, Y. & Ellis, R. (1998). Implicit knowledge, explicit knowledge and general language proficiency. Language teaching research, 2(1), 1-23. : Howarth, P. (1998). Phraseology and second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 2444. : Lear, D. & Abbott, A. (2009). Aligning expectations for mutually beneficial community service-learning: The case of Spanish language proficiency, cultural knowledge, and professional skills. Hispania, 92(2), 312-323. : Lorenzo, F., Granados, A. & Ávila, I. (2019). The development of cognitive academic language proficiency in multilingual education: Evidence of a longitudinal study on the language of history. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 41, 100767. |